Whoever said you had to suffer to be beautiful had not discovered Sargossa.
We put this label in the Measure back in July, when we discovered it; I wore my
Momentum sandals all summer. The Sargossa label is based on a patent-pending,
super-comfortable sole with medical-grade padding. It works. They are not cheap
(about £160-£200) but they are worth it.
Marks and Spencer suede boot, £59Photograph: PR
2. On the subject of money: cheap high heels rarely work. High-street labels
that are aimed at 17-year-olds have very pretty shoes, yes. But don’t come
crying to me when your feet are in shreds. I suspect 17-year-olds have higher
pain thresholds, possibly connected to their higher tolerance for alcohol. Marks
& Spencer’s shoe department, on the other hand, can be an unexpected
treasure trove: I love this suede boot. Carvella sandal, £120Photograph: PR
3. Which brings us to boots and ankle support. The traditional, open-front
court shoe is the least comfortable kind of shoe you can wear, as your foot has
to grip on to the sole. Anything that holds your foot across the front will be
more comfortable (see my picks in points one and two). A shoe such as this
Carvela cage-front sandal will be much more comfortable than a more bare shoe.
The lace-up-front high heel is much-worn by high-heel pros (see: super-stylist
and front row star Sophia Neophitou), as it looks fancy and hot but is
surprisingly comfortable.
4. The cobbler is your friend. Get your heel tips replaced frequently and
your shoes resoled when they wear out. Buy leather insoles for added comfort.
Shoe comfort depends on engineering, and engineering requires maintenance.
5. Be ruthless about editing your choice, and only consider heel heights you
can actually manage. 100mm is a standard height for many labels – but most women
can only actually manage 70mm. If you have two pairs of 100mm heels and you
seldom wear them, do NOT buy any more: look for 50-70mm. They are surprisingly
hard to find, but worth seeking out.
Cocorose shoe, £85Photograph: PR
6. Last resort: when I go out to a fancy fashion party, I wear high heels and
carry a tiny clutch bag but I bend one Cocorose foldable ballet slipper in each
of my coat pockets
Rosamund
Pike in high heels. 'I live in hope that one day we will view high heels with
the same horror with which we view foot-binding.' Photograph: Stephen
Hird/Reuters
After well over half a lifetime studying, contemplating and documenting the
vagaries of human behaviour and psychology, I must issue a confession. There is
one significant trait of my fellow earthlings which leaves me utterly baffled
and stumped. I am talking about shoes.
I first became fully aware of women’s relationship with footwear while still
in my teens. An attractive young woman with whom I was nurturing a friendship
casually remarked that she could never go out with me because I wore bad shoes.
She said it with such certainty that it was clear she considered this not a
temporary lapse in my fashion sense, but a profound and permanent character
flaw. She could happily overlook my big wonky ears, ginger hair, freckles and
lisp, but my scruffy supermarket pumps were the deal-breaker.
Many years later, one of my dearest friends was grumbling about the blisters
and bruises being caused by her latest proud purchase. I muttered something
about taking more care when trying things on in the shop and she looked at me as
if I had started speaking fluent Martian. “I’d never not buy a nice pair of
shoes just because they didn’t fit!” she exclaimed, then we sat gawping at each
other while silent mutual incomprehension calcified the air.
I had thought men’s relationship with footwear was more simple. Yes, some men
collect trainers the way I collect music and others collect stamps, but we
really don’t care that much what women wear on their feet, do we? Or so I
thought until this month, when academia came along to shatter my complacency. It
turns out that the typical man does indeed care about women’s shoes and,
surprise, surprise, it is high heels that press his buttons.
A study in the new issue of the Archives of Sexual Behaviour reveals that a
woman who stands in the street and asks passing men for help in filling out a
survey, or who “accidentally” drops a glove will get more positive responses if
she is wearing heels than flats. She’ll also attract more attention when sitting
in a bar. The author Nicolas Guéguen said that a woman’s heel size “exerts a
powerful effect on men’s behaviour”. He was unsure why this should be happening,
but suggested that the over-association of high heels with women’s sexiness and
could lead men to misinterpret the sexual intent of women with high heels.
It is hard to argue with this. Even the most committed evolutionary
psychologist would struggle to claim that our ancestors on the savanna enjoyed
an evolutionary advantage if they propped up their arches on a couple of twigs
while sabre-toothed tigers were on the prowl. As tactical mating strategies go,
that one would be pretty stupid.
Further light is shone on the issue by the latest edition of Podiatry Now (I
have the best bedtime reading). Given the damage that can be done to women’s
feet by high-heeled shoes, podiatrists have an obvious interest in this
matter.
Into the fray steps Dr Chris Morriss-Roberts, Britain’s leading expert in
podolinguistics (quite possibly Britain’s only expert in podolinguistics, but
credit where it’s due). He heard of a case of a 90-year-old woman with extensive
feet problems caused by her footwear, who admitted that she wore high heels to
look attractive to her husband. When asked, he admitted that he’d always hated
the bloody things. I paraphrase, but not much. This set Morriss-Roberts off on a
quest to find out what heterosexual men really think about women’s shoes. I read
the paper eagerly anticipating the twist – surely it would transpire that after
all these years of bunions and claw-toe, men really don’t care what women have
on their feet?
It turned out that few men agree with the elderly husband (and me) and most
are helpless suckers for a high heel and a strap. They reported being excited by
the assertive brand of femininity they imply. As one research participant put
it: “I sense authority behind that … what’s going on for me with high heels is a
sense of politics, behind that there is an element of vulnerability, and a sense
that the foot is being controlled by the shoe.”
Let us not forget that a stiletto is a weapon designed to slide through the
ribs and stab the heart.
For what it is worth (ie nothing), personally I’m more attracted to a woman
who looks like she can drink me under the table then carry me home, making a
sturdy pair of DMs just the ticket. I live in hope that one day the human race
will view high heels with the same horror with which we view foot-binding. Women
would be spared innumerable podiatric agonies and men would, I think, just about
cope. Until then I shall content myself with the knowledge that I’m right and
the rest of the human race is a bit daft. And these supermarket pumps? They’re
actually very comfortable you know.
Daphne Selfe: 'Everyone can look lovely.' Photograph: Nick Ballon The
older model: Daphne Selfe Do models eat biscuits? Daphne Selfe does. "And cake," she says – "Are
you sure you won't have a sandwich?" – before we sit down in the living room of
her Hertfordshire home. You may recognise Selfe from the fashion pages of the Guardian, or from
Vogue, advertising campaigns and style magazines such as Dazed & Confused.
She has been shot by Mario Testino, Rankin and Nick Knight. She is 83, and last
year appeared more in demand than ever. Her long silver hair has become her trademark, though today it's pinned
back. "I think it's fine for a woman of my age to have long hair," she says,
"but I think we should wear it up." She's happy to talk and talk, so I let her
get on with it while I study her face. Her cheekbones are sharp, her blue eyes
shine and her skin looks lived-in and luminous. Her secret? "I have an Irish
family behind me, which is good for looks," she says with a smile. "But everyone
can look lovely. It's what's in your head that counts – your outlook." As a young woman, Selfe wanted to work with horses and helped run a
riding school. Then she moved to Reading and got a job in a department store.
When a local photographer organised a modelling competition, the shop girls
applied and Selfe won. After that, she trained with an agency – "We were taught
how to walk, how to do hair and make-up, because in those days you had to do all
that yourself. It's not like now, when you have all these people to transform
you." Around the same time, she met her future husband, Jim. Soon after, they
were married with three children, and Selfe gave up modelling. Did she miss it?
"No! With three children? That was what you did. You expected to give up work
when you got married." In the 60s, Selfe considered going back to modelling and approached a few
agencies. "No way," she says, with a dramatic eye roll. "They didn't like the
look of me. It was people like Twiggy and Jean Shrimpton. I just didn't fit."
Was it a terrible rejection? "No! As a model you have to learn to be rejected. I
know if I do five auditions, I might get one. And if I don't, so what?" Not until 1998, aged 70, did Selfe – by then a widow – get her big break.
The label Red Or Dead was looking for older models for its London fashion week
show and Selfe, who had stayed registered with an agent, was cast. The stylist
suggested she contact Vogue, which was working on an issue celebrating age. At
the shoot, she met a scout for Models 1. "And I haven't looked back." The fashion world has changed since she first became a model. Then she
was a size 12 – "A strapping girl" – but now the standard size is a six or
eight. "That's much too thin. If you're very tall, you've got to have some flesh
on you. I don't think being too thin is awfully pretty." She has undoubtedly stood up for diversity in a world that venerates
youth. "People now get to 40 and think, 'Oh my God', but so what? Everybody has
to get old." We are not used to seeing older people presented in a sexy way – and
Selfe has done some sexy shoots. She nods. "I don't mind. I used to be an
artists' model. What upsets me is the way older people don't bother any more. I
never go out without make-up. I do my hair." She would never have cosmetic surgery. "Or Botox. I think it's a shame.
Somebody I know went to America and they said, 'All these people with these
fabulous faces, then you see them on the beach and they've got wrinkly bodies.'
Why?" Selfe puts her good skin down to her genes, exercise, good diet and
skincare. Does she mourn her youthful beauty? She shakes her head. "Age just
makes you a bit slower." She thinks for a while and then smiles. "I can't wear
high heels now, but I'm not bothered." What makes a good model, and whom do you admire? Bone structure,
attitude – and a good agent. You've got to be very adaptable. I like Gisele
Bündchen. What have you eaten today? Every morning I put carrot, celery, apple
and ginger in my juicer, and I make my own muesli. I'll have a proper lunch –
chicken or salmon with rice and lots of vegetables. I don't eat as much red meat
as I used to. I'll have a piece of cake at tea, then soup for supper. I drink a
lot of water, but I barely drink alcohol now. I might have a quarter of a glass
of wine at dinner. What was your worst job? An ad I did for Bupa – I was photographed in
a swimming pool with no heating. Would you recommend modelling as a career to your granddaughter? Yes.
It's fine as long as you know what you're letting yourself in for, are
strong-minded and take it with a pinch of salt. Some people [in the fashion
industry] can be very rude. Who is your favourite designer? Etro – it's bohemian but wearable. I
like unusual clothes. I don't like to go out looking frumpy.